Suchergebnisse

The Maltese "passports for sale" (Golden Passports) was big news a year or two ago but has now disappeared below the radar of public attention. Yet, the mills of justice might grind slowly, but grind they do. The case brought by the Commission against Malta is scheduled to be heard by the CJEU sometime later this year.
So, Malta offers passports for sale. Quelle Horreur! I hear you sniffing with disgust and indignation. They sell their citizenship, and hoopla – automatically these new citizens, ipso facto and ipso jure are European Citizens enjoying all the rights and duties which attach to such.

Three years ago, in the wake of the Weiss judgment of the German Federal Constitutional Court, we proposed the creation of a "Mixed Chamber" in the Court of Justice of the European Union, to rule in last instance on judicial disputes on points of Union competence. The rationale of a Chamber so composed is not obvious. After all, in a Union in which EU Law has primacy over national law, in which the autonomy of EU law is all-pervasive and where the Court of Justice is the ultimate interpreter of EU law, why should a Mixed Chamber be needed? We believe there are at least three good reasons that make a Mixed Chamber as salient as ever.

Protection of individual rights has been a central feature of much of the judicial review by supreme courts in Western countries in the postwar era. Concepts such as individual dignity and privacy, as well as more classical notions of liberty and equality before the law, have been the standard repositories of constitutional interpretation by courts reviewing governmental legislation and administrative action. The concept and practice of judicial review have penetrated, albeit in a limited way, even legal cultures which for long have resisted, such as Britain and France. I Indeed, judicial review in general and the protection of individual rights in particular, are widely considered as a conditio sine qua non of democracy and the rule of law. But it is no exaggeration to say that all jurisdictions where this judicial power is exercised—even the oldest, the United States—have seen in the last forty years fierce controversies concerning the limits within which, and the principles upon which, judges should exercise their power to overturn majoritarian legislation.

Dieser Band versammelt Aufsätze renommierter Völker-und Europarechtler über Vergangenheit und Zukunft des internationalen Rechts, die aus Anlass des 100-jährigen Gründungsjubiläums der Frankfurter Universität entstanden sind. Es geht um die Geschichte von Völker- und Europarecht, die zentrale Bedeutung der spiritual dimension der europäischen Rechtsordnung und um das Internet als Chance, alle von globaler Rechtsetzung betroffenen Personen am Entscheidungsprozess zu beteiligen.
Mit Beiträgen von Michael Bothe, Stefan Kadelbach, Martti Koskenniemi, Joseph H.H. Weiler und Ingolf Pernice.